<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Libertine &#187; lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertine.efx3.com/tag/lists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertine.efx3.com</link>
	<description>Vidi, vici, veni -- I saw, I conquered, I came</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:04:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2010 List of Banned Words</title>
		<link>http://libertine.efx3.com/2010/01/01/2010-list-of-banned-words/</link>
		<comments>http://libertine.efx3.com/2010/01/01/2010-list-of-banned-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>libertine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertine.efx3.com/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lake Superior State University has released its annual list of &#8220;banished words&#8221;; words they consider trite, overused, annoying, or a combination of all three. Following below is the list, with my comments in italics: SHOVEL-READY &#8220;Apparently, the generally accepted definition of this phrase is to imply that a project has been completely designed and all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lake Superior State University has released its annual list of &#8220;banished words&#8221;; words they consider trite, overused, annoying, or a combination of all three.  Following below is the list, with my comments in italics:</p>
<p>SHOVEL-READY</p>
<p>&#8220;Apparently, the generally accepted definition of this phrase is to imply that a project has been completely designed and all that is left to do is to implement it&#8230;however, when something dies, it, too, is shovel-ready for burial and so I get confused about the meaning. I would suggest that we just say the project is ready to implement.” – Jerry Redington, Keosauqua, Iowa.</p>
<p>&#8220;Stick a shovel in it. It&#8217;s done.&#8221; – Joe Grimm, Bloomfield Hills, Mich.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to take a shovel upside the head of the person who coined this obnoxious phrase.</p>
<p>TRANSPARENT/TRANSPARENCY</p>
<p>&#8220;In the lexicon of the political arena, this word is supposed to mean obvious or easily understood. In reality, political transparency is more invisible than obvious!&#8221; &#8212; Deb Larson, Bellaire, Mich.</p>
<p>Someone throw a blanket over &#8220;transparent&#8221;.</p>
<p>CZAR</p>
<p>Long used by the media as a metaphor for positions of high authority, including “baseball czar” Judge Kenesaw Mountain Landis, appointed by team owners as commissioner-for-life in 1919. U.S. president Woodrow Wilson had an “industry czar” during World War I. Lesser-known “czar” roles in government during the last 100 years include: censorship, housing and oil czars in 1941; rubber czar in 1942; patronage czar (1945); clean-up (1952); missile (1954); inflation (1971); e-commerce (1998); bioethics, faith-based and reading czars (2001); bird flu (2004); democracy (2005); abstinence and birth control czars (2006); and weatherization czar (2008).</p>
<p>I thought the Russians took care of &#8220;czars&#8221; in 1917.</p>
<p>TWEET</p>
<p>And all of its variations…tweetaholic, retweet, twitterhea, twitterature, twittersphere….</p>
<p>Jay Brazier of Williamston, Mich. says she supposes that tweeters might be &#8220;twits.&#8221;</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d go for &#8220;twats&#8221;, myself.</p>
<p>APP</p>
<p>&#8220;Must we b sbjct to yt another abrv? Why does the English language have to fit on a two-inch screen? I hate the sound of it. I think I&#8217;ll listen to a symph on the rad.&#8221; &#8212; Edward R. Bolt, Grand Rapids, Mich.</p>
<p>Put &#8220;cr&#8221; in front of &#8220;app&#8221; and you get crapp!</p>
<p>SEXTING</p>
<p>Sending sexually explicit pictures and text messages through the cell phone.</p>
<p>&#8220;Any dangerous new trend that also happens to have a clever mash-up of words, involves teens, and gets television talk show hosts interested must be banished.&#8221; – Ishmael Daro, Saskatoon, Sask., Canada.</p>
<p>A &#8220;word&#8221; spoken by those who aren&#8217;t getting the real thing.</p>
<p>FRIEND AS A VERB</p>
<p>Came into popularity through social networking websites. You add someone to your network by &#8220;friending&#8221; them, or remove them by &#8220;unfriending&#8221; them.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;Befriend&#8217; is much more pleasant to the human ear and a perfectly useful word in the dictionary.&#8221; – Kevin K., Morris, Okla.</p>
<p>I pretty much hate any noun that is made into a verb and vice versa. </p>
<p>TEACHABLE MOMENT</p>
<p>What might otherwise be known as &#8216;a lesson.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a condescending substitute for &#8216;opportunity to make a point,&#8217;&#8221; says Eric Rosenquist of College Station, Tex.</p>
<p>So, portions of time are now capable of being taught, hmm?</p>
<p>IN THESE ECONOMIC TIMES….</p>
<p>&#8220;Overused and redundant. Aren&#8217;t ALL times &#8216;these economic times&#8217;?&#8221; &#8212; Barb Stutesman, Three Rivers, Mich.</p>
<p>I think this stuffy phrase has outlived its fifteen minutes of overuse.</p>
<p>STIMULUS</p>
<p>&#8220;Everything in the news is about the stimulus packages&#8230;it is no longer a grant, it&#8217;s stimulus money, stimulus checks, etc. I think it is just being over-used.&#8221; Teri Heikkila, Rudyard, Mich.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got your &#8220;stimulus package&#8221; right here! </p>
<p>TOXIC ASSETS</p>
<p>&#8220;Whatever happened to simply &#8216;bad stocks,&#8217; &#8216;debts,&#8217; or &#8216;loans&#8217;?&#8221; &#8212; Monty Heidenreich, Homewood, Ill.</p>
<p>This list wouldn&#8217;t be complete without an oxymoron.</p>
<p>TOO BIG TO FAIL</p>
<p>&#8220;Just for the record, nothing&#8217;s too big to fail unless the government lets it.&#8221; Claire Shefchik, Brooklyn, NY.</p>
<p>Tell this to the owners of the Titanic!.</p>
<p>BROMANCE</p>
<p>&#8220;I am sick of combined words the media creates to make them sound catchier. Frenemies? Bromances? Blogorrhea? I&#8217;m going to scream!&#8221; – Kaylynn, Alberta, Canada.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been lucky to have never heard this one before.</p>
<p>CHILLAXIN&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;Heard everywhere from MTV to ESPN to CNN. A bothersome term that seeks to combine chillin&#8217; with relaxin&#8217; makes me want to be &#8216;axin&#8217; this word.&#8221; – Tammy, Sault Ste. Marie, Mich.</p>
<p>What?  Does this mean to put an axe into the refrigerator?</p>
<p>OBAMA-prefix or roots?</p>
<p>The LSSU Word Banishment Committee held out hope that folks would want to Obama-ban Obama-structions, but were surprised that no one Obama-nominated any, such as these compiled by the Oxford Dictionary in 2009: Obamanomics, Obamanation, Obamafication, Obamacare, Obamalicious, Obamaland….We say Obamanough already.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s bomb all the Obama coinages.</p>
<p>My personal contribution to this year&#8217;s list would be:</p>
<p>FAIL used as a noun.</p>
<p>For example, a football team loses big in a game and it&#8217;s dubbed &#8220;an epic fail&#8221;.  This one made me grind my teeth the first time I heard it.  It may be an &#8220;epic failure&#8221;, but it&#8217;s NOT an &#8220;epic fail&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertine.efx3.com/2010/01/01/2010-list-of-banned-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telling It Like It Is</title>
		<link>http://libertine.efx3.com/2009/09/23/telling-it-like-it-is/</link>
		<comments>http://libertine.efx3.com/2009/09/23/telling-it-like-it-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>libertine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullshit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertine.efx3.com/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning I was browsing on the Yahoo home page where I saw the title of an article &#8220;10 Ways to Make Your Boss Happy&#8221;.  Rolling my eyes, I went to read the article but found out it was a video, which I cannot run on my slow, crappy dialup.   But I&#8217;m sure it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning I was browsing on the Yahoo home page where I saw the title of an article &#8220;10 Ways to Make Your Boss Happy&#8221;.  Rolling my eyes, I went to read the article but found out it was a video, which I cannot run on my slow, crappy dialup.   But I&#8217;m sure it was more in the ilk of corporate buzzword euphemism, so I don&#8217;t think I missed much.  What follows below is my rendition of the article&#8217;s title, without all the euphemistic bullshit and beating around the bush.</p>
<p><strong>How to Make Your Boss Happy</strong></p>
<p>1.  Have No Life Of Your Own<br />
2.  Do All the Work, Give Him All the Credit<br />
3.  Volunteer for Everything<br />
4.  Be an Office Snitch<br />
5.  Never Take a Day Off For Anything<br />
6.  Run Personal Errands For Him For Free<br />
7.  Be a Yes Man<br />
8.  Never Take A Sick Day No Matter How Sick You Are<br />
9.  Cover For the Boss When He Screws Up &#8212; Take the Blame Yourself<br />
10.Give Up Anything That Might Interfere With Your Job (family, friends, etc)</p>
<p>And there you have it &#8212; what a boss REALLY wants, with all the bullshit stripped away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertine.efx3.com/2009/09/23/telling-it-like-it-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Potential for Influence</title>
		<link>http://libertine.efx3.com/2009/05/06/influence-vs-heroism/</link>
		<comments>http://libertine.efx3.com/2009/05/06/influence-vs-heroism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>libertine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chesley Sullenberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heroism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertine.efx3.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I visited the Time Magazine website today, where they had a list of who they considered to be the 100 most influential people in the world.  The list was broken down into several categories. Michelle Obama made the list, which isn&#8217;t surprising, considering who she married to.   Having the ear of the President of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I visited the Time Magazine website today, where they had a list of who they considered to be the 100 most influential people in the world.  The list was broken down into several categories.</p>
<p>Michelle Obama made the list, which isn&#8217;t surprising, considering who she married to.   Having the ear of the President of the United States certainly gives a person the <em>potential</em> to very influential indeed.</p>
<p>But it irritated me that Mrs Obama was named number one in the category of heroes, ahead of a real hero, Chesley Sullenberger, who was number 2 on the list.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that Michelle Obama is an extremely intelligent and capable woman, as well as being a fine wife and mother, but she does not fit the definition of &#8220;hero&#8221;, especially when compared to Sullenberger, who is the genuine article.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it; the only reason she made the list at all is because of whom she  chose to marry.  And as far as I&#8217;m concerned, wise romantic choices are in no way heroic.  She has the potential to be quite influential in other spheres of influence and to be a role model for young women, but this doesn&#8217;t make her a <em>hero.</em></p>
<p>And she&#8217;s been First Lady for only a very short time.  It&#8217;s way too early to tell whether she&#8217;ll be able to exert true lasting influence in that role as did  First Ladies Eleanor Roosevelt, Edith Wilson, Betty Ford, and Hillary Clinton, to name a few.  I&#8217;m betting that she will, but right now, to include her on such a list is premature.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertine.efx3.com/2009/05/06/influence-vs-heroism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
